Skip to content
The UFO LibraryA rack of paperbacks on the UFO record
Back to the rack

The UFO Library: Humanoid encounter

Varginha Incident

1996Varginha, Minas Gerais, BrazilHumanoid encounterJanuary 20, 1996Evidence rated contested

On 20 January 1996 three young women in Varginha, Brazil reported a crouching, dark-skinned, red-eyed creature, spawning rumors of a military capture that an Army inquiry attributed to a misidentified local man.

Background

Varginha is a coffee-growing city of roughly 130,000 people in southern Minas Gerais, Brazil. In January 1996 it had no special place in the world's UFO literature. Within weeks, rumors had made it the centre of what Brazilian ufologists call the "ET de Varginha" case, often described as Brazil's Roswell. The comparison is apt in one respect: like Roswell, the case is a bundle of loosely connected stories, and the bundle grew over the years. The one event that is clearly documented is small. Everything dramatic in the case rests on rumor, secondhand claims and ufologists' later reconstructions.

It helps to keep three layers apart. The first is the sighting of 20 January 1996 by three young women. The second is a cloud of associated claims: UFO sightings in the preceding days, creatures captured by the military and moved between hospitals, a police officer who died after touching one, and animals dying at a local zoo. The third is the official response, an Army-led police-military inquiry (IPM) that reported in 1997 and rejected the extraterrestrial interpretation.

Events

According to the Wikipedia summary of the original accounts, at about 3:30 p.m. on Saturday 20 January 1996, three women aged between 14 and 22 were walking along Rua Dr. Benevenuto Braz Vieira, near the Jardim Andere subdivision. They saw an unfamiliar being crouching beside a wall in a vacant lot. They described a large-headed biped with dark, oily skin, patterns "like veins" on the body, three bumps on the head and two red "eyes." Reports mention a smell resembling ammonia. The being seemed unsteady. The women ran home and told their mother they had seen "the devil."

Rumor followed quickly. Over the next days and weeks, local and then national stories claimed that:

  • strange lights or objects had been seen over the region in the preceding days, and that an object had come down;
  • the Fire Department, Army vehicles and military and police personnel were seen in the area, and that one or more creatures had been captured, possibly after a night-time operation;
  • a creature had been taken to a hospital, then onward to a university in Campinas (SP) and in some versions abroad;
  • a young military policeman had been exposed to a creature and died soon after;
  • several animals at the Varginha zoo had died at about the same time.

Ufologists later connected these elements into one narrative. The 1997 Isto É report (issue 1447, 25 June 1997), reproduced by Patrick Gross, notes that the zoo deaths were reported but not explained, and that more than eighty ufologists had visited the region. It also records further uncorroborated sightings, for example a 67-year-old housewife who said in April 1996 that she had seen another "alien" at the zoo.

The death of Marco Eli Chereze

The strongest emotional anchor of the case is the death of Marco Eli Chereze, a 23-year-old soldier of the Minas Gerais Military Police who belonged to the force's intelligence section. According to the Estado de Minas retrospective, he died on 15 February 1996, with no known previous illness. Ufologists claim he took part in the night-time capture, touched the creature without protection and was infected or poisoned. They point to a discreet funeral with a sealed coffin. The military inquiry attributed his death to septic shock after routine surgery and denied any contact with outside agents. The Isto É report says military police records show he was not on the duty roster for 20 January, a point his mother disputed, while his sister Marta offered the supposition that he was infected by touching the creature. Edison Boaventura Jr., author of ETs de Varginha: montando o quebra-cabeça, argues that the family was kept silent and that the medical file was treated as confidential.

A correction is needed to earlier versions of this entry: Chereze was a soldier, not a physician, and there is no documented "Dr. Marco Chereze" who performed an autopsy. The autopsy and "alien body" claims come from ufological sources, not from any verified document.

Investigation

Civilian investigators

The first and most influential civilian investigator was the lawyer and ufologist Ubirajara Franco Rodrigues, who began work the day after the sighting. His video interviews with witnesses (he claimed fifteen recorded testimonies, many anonymous) supplied much of the early material. The first newspaper report in Estado de Minas appeared on 2 February 1996, and the paper's 1996 archive documents the publicity that followed: an artist's sketch drawn with the help of a TV Alterosa cameraman, and a laboratory analysis by UFMG of a plate with inscriptions. The supposed mention of creatures at Unicamp was passed on by ufologists, with no confirmation from the university.

Rodrigues later became the case's most notable convert to doubt. The Estado de Minas piece reports that he now says he does not believe in extraterrestrials and concedes that by suggesting an alien origin to witnesses he made an error that may have shaped their memories. Marco Antonio Petit of Revista UFO has a different reading: he says Rodrigues received phone calls from military personnel and was pressured into silence. The split divided the investigators.

The Army inquiry

The Army opened a military police inquiry (IPM no. 18/97). Its conclusion, summarised by Wikipedia and the Estado de Minas, is that the three women mistook a local man, Luiz Antônio de Paula, known as "Mudinho" ("Little Mute"), for a monster. He was a socially vulnerable man with an intellectual disability. The commander of the 24th Military Police Battalion supplied photographs of him and said that he "probably has some mental disability." The inquiry's head said that the Fire Department, Army truck and Army cadet school (EsSA) movements were routine, "real facts" that had been "incorrectly interpreted" as a capture and a transport to Campinas. It found no record of NASA or US government involvement.

Vitório Pacaccini, author of Incidente em Varginha (with Maxs Portes, 1996), rejects the Mudinho explanation, arguing that the women knew him and would have recognised him. Petit sees the whole official response as a cover-up and compares it to Operação Prato, the Brazilian Air Force investigation of Colares sightings in the 1970s that ended without clear conclusions.

The case for / against

For. The sighting was reported on the day, by several people, and they described a similar creature in similar terms. The local rumor mill produced military activity reports quickly, and a real person did die within weeks. Brazilian institutions, as in many countries, have a history of reluctance to discuss UFO files, which makes official denial less than persuasive to believers. The lack of publicly released medical records on Chereze leaves a gap that invites speculation. Ufologists such as Petit and Boaventura argue that the pieces fit together.

Against. The documented core is a brief sighting by frightened young women, and the identification with a known, unusual-looking local man is concrete and testable, unlike the alternatives. Nothing physical has been produced: no body, no tissue, no verified photograph or video of the supposed creature, no hospital record naming one. The ancillary stories are secondhand or anonymous. The "connections" between the zoo deaths, the soldier's death and the creature are asserted by ufologists, and the Wikipedia article notes that no evidence for them is presented. Chereze's death by post-surgical sepsis is a recognised medical cause, and the military records place him off duty on the day. The skeptic Brian Dunning of Skeptoid concluded that "literally nothing at all happened that was remotely unusual." The conversion of Rodrigues, the leading civilian investigator, further weakens the case, and his own admission that he may have contaminated witness memory is a standard concern in humanoid-encounter investigations.

Because of this imbalance between a small documented event and a large rumor structure, the credibility is best described as contested, not "well-documented" as earlier recorded here.

Cultural impact

Varginha has become the town's brand. Grey-alien dolls in football jerseys are sold near the site, alien designs appear in municipal advertising, bus stops are shaped like spaceships, and the 20-metre water tower with a disc-shaped reservoir is known as the Nave Espacial de Varginha. The case inspired books by Pacaccini and Portes (1996), Ubirajara Rodrigues (2001), Roger Leir (UFO Crash in Brazil, 2005), Marco Antonio Petit (2015) and Edison Boaventura Jr. (2022), comics, a 1998 video game (Incidente em Varginha), a Beyond the Truth episode (1998), a Chasing UFOs episode (2012), the short film 1996 (2020), James Fox's documentary Moment of Contact (2022) and O Mistério de Varginha (2025). It remains the most widely known Brazilian UFO case internationally.

Current status

On the thirtieth anniversary in 2026 the Brazilian press again reviewed the case, and the Estado de Minas listed what remains open: who the women actually saw, the exact circumstances and records of Chereze's death, the truth of the claimed body transfers, and how far investigators shaped the witnesses' accounts. The official position is unchanged: the IPM found a misidentified man and routine activity. Believers hold that the records are incomplete or withheld. No independent physical evidence has emerged, so the case stays where it began, a vivid sighting surrounded by a very large rumor, and a fixture of Brazilian popular culture regardless of what happened on that vacant lot.

Witnesses

  • Three young women (aged 14–22) who reported the creature on Rua Dr. Benevenuto Braz Vieira
  • Marco Eli Chereze (23), military policeman who died 15 Feb 1996; his sister Marta and mother Lourdes gave later accounts
  • Ubirajara Franco Rodrigues, lawyer and first civilian investigator, who later expressed doubt
  • Luiz Antônio de Paula ('Mudinho'), the man the Army inquiry identified as the likely source

Evidence

  • Testimony of the three women, taken on and after the day
  • Contemporary press coverage (Estado de Minas, 2 Feb 1996)
  • Army-led inquiry IPM no. 18/97 (misidentification; routine activity)
  • Military police records showing Chereze off duty on 20 Jan (disputed by his mother)
  • No physical remains, tissue, photographs or hospital records of any creature have been produced

Filed under

Watch

Varginha UFO Crash: Alien Contact, Government Denial and Coverup

The Why Files3.5M views, 166K likes

The Basement: James Fox | UFO Disclosure, Varginha, and the Captured Creature

The Why Files1.4M views, 38K likes

The Brazil Varginha UFO Incident That Killed a Military Officer?

Caspersight394K views, 20K likes

Neurosurgeon Who Treated the Varginha Alien Finally Speaks Out | James Fox

Danny Jones Clips206K views, 3K likes

Brazilian UFO Crash - The Truth

The Great British Channel77K views, 892 likes

Where this entry came from

ProvenanceAgent indexedUpdated 9d ago3 sources

Drafted by the archive's AI research agent from the sources below; corrections from readers are reviewed and folded in.

First indexed
06 JUL 26 // 13:18Z
Last updated
03 NOV 26 // 04:44Z
  1. Varginha UFO incident, Wikipedia
  2. Caso Varginha: versão oficial e alternativas, Maria Dulce Miranda, Estado de Minas
  3. Varginha report (Isto É no. 1447, 25 June 1997), Patrick Gross's ufology site / Isto É

Notes

  1. Varginha UFO incident, Wikipedia
  2. Caso Varginha: versão oficial e alternativas, Maria Dulce Miranda, Estado de Minas
  3. Varginha report (Isto É no. 1447, 25 June 1997), Patrick Gross's ufology site / Isto É

Also available

Buying through these links supports the library. We may earn a commission.

Post-Cold-War

Illustration, AI-generated. Cover painting is an illustration, not evidence.

Also on this shelf

Related cases, then more from the same era.

From the same era, Post-Cold-War. See the full timeline

Readers' notes

Corrections, memories and arguments from readers.

Spotted a mistake or have something to add? Suggest a correction or join the discussion.

Reader discussion

Sign in to join the discussion — registered readers can comment and vote.

Retrieving marginalia…